Here are
some recent editorials I wrote for The Gulf Today. (Posted for my records):
Mexican
anger over
wall
plan justified
Separation
walls have no place in a globalised world, where integration of diverse communities
remains the key word. The world should celebrate diversity not just virtually
but in practical terms too.
That it
can be done has been aptly proved by the great nation, the UAE, where people of
over 200 different nationalities live and work in perfect harmony.
In this
background, US President Donald Trump’s divisive plans like building a
multi-billion-dollar border separation wall or taxing Mexican imports have
naturally drawn the fury of not only Mexico and Latin America, but the rest of
the world too.
The White
House has stated Trump could build the wall with a new 20 per cent tax on goods
from Mexico.
Surprisingly,
the US president's office later retracted, saying it was not endorsing the
border adjustment tax and it was merely an example of a way of making Mexico
pay up.
The
separation wall idea enraged Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto so much that
he scrapped a planned trip to meet Trump.
Mexican
Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray has already cautioned that such a tax would
make Mexican imports more expensive for US consumers and they would end up
paying for the wall.
He has
also made it clear that Mexico is willing to talk with the US in order to
maintain good relations, but paying for Trump's border wall is not negotiable.
Trump’s
plans have already ignited global worries. New Zealand medical device firm
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, for example, has declared that it would
consider switching factories making products bound for the US from Mexico to
New Zealand if the Trump administration taxes Mexican imports.
The
company, a major global supplier of specialised respiratory equipment for
hospitals, is one of the first companies with Mexican operations to disclose
how it would respond to the proposed tariff on imports.
The
situation on the ground reflects a different reality contradicting Trump’s
arguments.
Under
pressure from former president Barack Obama's administration after a massive
surge of unaccompanied child migrants in 2014, Mexico launched a crackdown on
illegal immigration at its border with Guatemala.
It
deported 147,370 migrants last year, compared to 80,900 in 2013, according to
interior ministry figures.
While
Trump wants Mexico to pay for the wall, there are now more Mexicans returning
home than migrating to the United States.
Unjustified
protectionism and closure of borders will change the peaceful order of the
world and come with grave consequences. Washington should stop playing with
fire.
Devastating
cruelty
against
Rohingya
The UN
human rights office has presented accounts of one of the most persecuted
communities in the world, the Rohingya of Myanmar, and it makes chilling
reading.
Words
cannot suffice to describe the suffering endured by Rohingya victims at the
hands of Myanmar security forces.
The
killing of babies, toddlers, children, women and elderly; opening fire at
people fleeing; burning of entire villages; massive detention; massive and
systematic rape and sexual violence; deliberate destruction of food and sources
of food — the testimonies presented by witnesses to UN officials could leave
tears in the eyes of even stone-hearted individuals.
One woman
told UN investigators how her eight-month baby boy had his throat slit. Another
was raped by soldiers and saw her five-year-old daughter killed as she tried to
stop them.
The
security forces committed mass killings and gang rapes of Rohingya Muslims and
burned their villages since October in a campaign, that as UN officials
themselves fear, amounts to crimes against humanity and possible ethnic
cleansing.
There is
sufficient proof to prove the dastardly crimes as the investigators have taken
photographs of bullet and knife wounds, burns, and injuries resulting from
beatings with rifle butts or bamboo sticks.
It is
shocking how human beings could treat innocent and helpless people so brutally.
Four UN
investigators gathered testimony last month from 220 Rohingya victims and
witnesses who fled the lockdown area in Maungdaw in Rakhine for the Cox's Bazar
district in Bangladesh.
Nearly
half reported a family member had been killed or disappeared while 101 women
reported having been raped or subjected to sexual violence, it said.
As UN
High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein has stated, the
devastating cruelty to which the Rohingya children have been subjected is
unbearable.
UN
mission leader Linnea Arvidsson has also indicated that the testimonies point
to a persecution on ethnic grounds, which is similar to what has been, in other
contexts, described as ethnic cleansing.
The UN
report has made it clear that the attacks on the Rohingya seem to have been
widespread as well as systematic, indicating the very likely commission of
crimes against humanity.
Myanmar
should accept responsibility for committing grave human rights violations
against its own people.
The UN
Human Rights Council should refer the issue to the UN Security Council, which
has the power to pass it on to the International Criminal Court.
Justice
has been delayed for the Rohingya, now at least don’t deny them justice.
UAE-India
bond
gets
stronger
Relations
between the UAE and India have remained historically strong thanks to the solid
foundation laid by the late Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan.
Crown
Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces His
Highness Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan’s upcoming visit to India as the
Chief Guest at India's Republic Day parade this week is expected to push the
UAE- relationship to a much higher level.
As per
reports, the two countries will sign as many as 16 agreements during the
high-profile visit of Sheikh Mohamed.
The
recent months have witnessed a rapid expansion in the ties as is evident in the
growing bilateral cooperation, continuous communication and exchange of visits
by top leadership from both sides.
Figures
speak volumes about the strength of the relationship.
Over 2.6
million Indians live in the UAE and love the country as their second home.
Trade
between the UAE and India, including oil trade, reached $50 billion in 2015, up
from $180 million in the 1970s, according to Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador
to India, who has described the growth of economic relations with India as
exceptional.
As he
pointed out, UAE companies contribute significantly towards development in
India. Abu Dhabi-based National Marine Dredging Company, NMDC, signed a $316
million contract last year for engineering, procurement and construction of the
new LNG terminal in Gujarat, and that Dubai's DP World is a market leader in
Indian container terminal operations.
The
Indian government earlier invited UAE companies to participate in the “Make in
India” initiative which offered scope for UAE investors in as many as 25
sectors including infrastructure, energy including renewable energy, defence,
railways and highways.
The
investments between the two countries are expected to get bigger in line with
the growth of the Indian economy by 7 per cent, which is more than the growth
rate of any other country in the world.
In an
interview with reputed Arabic language daily,
Al Khaleej, Navdeep Suri,
Indian Ambassador to the UAE, has asserted that the Indian government respects
and appreciates Sheikh Mohamed's wise and balanced vision, which is enshrined
in the values of tolerance, stability and moderation.
The
mutual trust and confidence makes the UAE-India bond exemplary.
The
economic, cultural and people-to-people ties between the two countries are so
deep-rooted that they offer a glittering example on the power of mutual respect
and understanding.
Quebec
mosque attack
a
despicable act
The
shooting at a Quebec City mosque during evening prayers that left six people
dead is an abhorrent act of violence that deserves to be condemned in the
strongest terms.
The
victims of the despicable attack were innocent Muslim worshippers.
The aim
of the attackers was visibly to break the spirit of peace and tolerance among
the people of Quebec.
Canada is
known as an open society that welcomes immigrants and people from all religions
without any prejudice.
Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau and Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard have both
correctly characterised the attack as a terrorist act.
Trudeau’s
statement reflects his government’s sincerity in maintaining harmony among
various sections.
As he
mentioned: "It is heart-wrenching to see such senseless violence.
Diversity is our strength, and religious tolerance is a value that we, as
Canadians, hold dear. Muslim-Canadians are an important part of our national
fabric, and these senseless acts have no place in our communities, cities and
country."
The
shooting has come at a time when Canada has vowed to open its arms to Muslims
and refugees after US President Donald Trump's controversial immigration ban
prompted travel chaos and outrage around the world.
Trudeau
had reacted to Trump's visa ban by tweeting: "To those fleeing
persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of
your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada."
He also
posted a picture of himself greeting a Syrian child at Toronto's airport in
late 2015. Trudeau oversaw the arrival of more than 39,000 Syrian refugees soon
after he was elected.
It is
heartening that Couillard has vowed to ensure the security of the people of
Quebec. "Quebec categorically rejects this barbaric violence," he
wrote. "Solidarity with Quebec people of Muslim faith."
Quebec
City Mayor Regis Labeaume, who appeared visibly shaken, also rightly expressed
the view that no person should pay with his or her life for their race or
colour.
The
mosque was already the target of hate last June during the Holy Month of
Ramadan. Other mosques in Canada have been targeted with racist graffiti in
recent months.
In this
era of rising extremism and widening conflicts characterised by a fundamental
disregard for human life, the need for tolerance can never be underestimated.
With
solidarity rallies planned across Quebec, peace-loving people from all
sections and faiths should stand united to take on the forces of hatred and
division.
After
all, hatred has no place in a sane society.
Genuine
concerns over
Duterte’s
drug war
Some
7,600 people have been killed since Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte
launched his war on drugs seven months ago, more than 2,500 in what police say
were shootouts during raids and sting operations.
There is
a genuine concern over the alarming number of deaths and this needs to be
addressed.
Duterte
came to power vowing to wipe out drugs and cautioning traffickers that they
risked death if they did not mend their ways.
On one
occasion Duterte vowed that 100,000 people would be killed and so many bodies
would be dumped in Manila Bay that the fish there would grow fat from feeding
on them.
While the
war on drugs is by itself a mission with a good intent, it is the methods being
adopted that are under question.
On
Thursday, Duterte declared he would issue an executive order for military
support in his fight against illicit drugs, which he said was a national
security threat and he would "kill more" people if he had to.
This
comment comes as another cause for worry.
All
police operations in the drug crackdown have been suspended due to deep-rooted
corruption.
A series
of scandals emerged over the past month in which police were caught committing
murder, kidnapping, extortion and robbery using the drug war as cover.
Duterte
has placed an anti-drugs agency in charge of the campaign and says he wants the
armed forces to play a supportive role.
New
York-based Human Rights Watch has cautioned that involving the military is a wrong
move because the armed forces have a track record of extrajudicial killings.
The group
claims that using military personnel for civilian policing anywhere heightens
the risk of unnecessary or excessive force and inappropriate military tactics.
Amnesty
International has also accused the police of systemic human rights abuses in
the drug war, including shooting dead defenceless people, fabricating evidence,
paying assassins to murder drug addicts and stealing from those they killed.
Amnesty
claims it documented victims as young as eight years old.
It may be
recalled that two UN human rights experts earlier urged Manila to stop the “extra-judicial
executions and killings.”
A furious
Duterte retorted that the Philippines might leave the United Nations, accusing
it of failing to fulfil its mandate.
The
Duterte government will do well to address the concerns by ensuring that the
law-enforcement efforts do not stray away from human rights obligations.
No comments:
Post a Comment